top of page

PRODUCT DESIGNER BLOG

Industrial Design for Industrial Manufacturing Equipment | When Industrial Design comes Full Circle

  • Sean Flickinger
  • Nov 24
  • 3 min read

Radius Engineering's Same-Qualified Resin Transfer Molding (SQRTM) Composite Molding Machine
Radius Engineering's Same-Qualified Resin Transfer Molding (SQRTM) Composite Molding Machine

Most people walk into a factory and see machinery. I walk in and see a conversation happening between humans and the equipment they rely on. That conversation can be smooth, intuitive, and efficient… or it can be complicated, frustrating, and expensive. The difference often comes down to Industrial Design—an element that’s historically overlooked in industrial manufacturing but is quickly becoming a competitive edge for companies who want their machines to run better, last longer, and feel like tools people want to use.

Over the years, I’ve had the privilege of supporting some truly forward-thinking manufacturing companies, and one standout example is Radius Engineering. I’ve worked with their team on several of their press machines, and they continue to impress me with how seriously they take usability, operator experience, and long-term machine evolution.

Radius is one of those rare engineering groups that not only welcomes suggestions—they implement them. Fast. Their clients regularly compliment how easy their machines are to operate and how operator-friendly their interfaces have become. Even better, Radius doesn’t treat each new project like a clean slate. They carry forward earlier learnings, allowing improvements to take root earlier in development and compound across product generations. That creates a measurable increase in fidelity and effectiveness with every new machine they release. That’s the power of working with a team that values Industrial Design as much as engineering horsepower.

But why does Industrial Design matter so much in manufacturing equipment? Because, unlike typical consumer products, these machines have multiple stakeholders, each with very different priorities—and each of them can make or break the machine’s success.


ree

The Many Stakeholders of Industrial Equipment Design

When designing industrial manufacturing equipment, you’re never designing for one person—you’re designing for an ecosystem.

1. Factory Operations Managers

They care about productivity, uptime, and equipment that supports predictable workflow. But here’s something many overlook: they also care about appearance. In interviews I’ve had with operations leaders, they repeatedly mention that equipment that runs well often looks good too. Machines that perform at a high level typically reflect that performance in their fit, finish, and overall presentation. To them, good aesthetics signal good engineering, and they’re right more often than not.

2. Equipment Operators

These are the people who interact with the machine every minute of every shift. For them, design determines whether the experience is intuitive or intimidating. Can they reach what they need? Can they see what they need? Does the machine respond in a way that’s predictable and confidence-building? Industrial Design is what turns complexity into clarity.


Reviewing control placements when all equipment is in place. Could this be better?
Reviewing control placements when all equipment is in place. Could this be better?

3. Maintenance and Service Personnel

If operators dance with the equipment all day, technicians perform the surgery. Their needs revolve around accessibility, service clearances, component layout, and minimizing downtime. Poor design decisions here often cost the factory more money than any single component on the machine.

4. Equipment Assemblers

They interact with the product long before any operator does. If the machine is designed without considering assembly efficiency, accuracy, or ergonomics, costs rise before the machine ever leaves the building.

5. Transporters and Installers

These teams determine how well the machine transitions to the real world. Does it strap down safely? Can it be lifted with standard equipment? Will it install smoothly even when on-site conditions are less than ideal? These are experience-defining touchpoints.

Breaking Down Stakeholder Needs

To build equipment that performs in the real world—not just on engineering drawings—you have to translate stakeholder needs into design categories such as:

  • Safety

  • Ergonomics

  • Human-centered design

  • Maintenance & service

  • Productivity

  • HMI / Human–Machine Interaction & Monitoring

  • Installation & transport

  • Aesthetics and brand expression

This framework ensures that every requirement—spoken or unspoken—gets built into the project scope. From that point on, you can shape the user experience from the first forklift lift to the last shift of the month.

Will it transport easily?Will it install quickly, even when conditions aren’t perfect?Will operators require special skills, or can they be trained efficiently?Can maintenance be performed without disrupting production?And importantly—will it look as good as it performs?

Great industrial design answers yes to all of these.

Design Machines People Want to Use

When all of these elements come together, manufacturers end up with equipment that is not only functional but thoughtfully crafted. Machines that run smoother, train faster, service easier, and maintain stronger brand appeal. This is where companies like Radius Engineering shine—and where I love helping teams bring their next generation of equipment to life.

If you develop industrial machinery and want your equipment to be more intuitive, more competitive, and more enjoyable to use, let’s talk. I’d be happy to bring this level of insight and design leadership to your next project.


Contact me anytime to elevate your equipment through purposeful, human-centered Industrial Design.

 
 
bottom of page